Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 00:27
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
What are some cool confidence hacks?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Who are the IT boys of the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th generation in K-pop?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Natural Tick Repellent Found—on Donkey Skin - Newser
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
What’s next?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Three New Minerals Discovered in the Southwestern U.S. - Indian Defence Review
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
* Underwater Smoke Signals: Humpbacks May Be Talking to Humans - SciTechDaily
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Thank you.